jmcquown wrote:
>
> Pete C. wrote:
> > Felice Friese wrote:
> >>
> >> "Pete C." <aux3.DOH.4@snet.net> wrote in message
> >> news:46CE39E4.E898FA01@snet.net...
> >>> elaine wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> "Pete C." <aux3.DOH.4@snet.net> wrote in message >>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>> snip............
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I immediately fire any doctor that doesn't follow my orders. They
> >>>>> are a service provider - nothing more - they follow my orders or
> >>>>> they loose my
> >>>>> business.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Pete C.
> >>>>
> >>>> Strange comments! Are you for real?
> >>>>
> >>>> e.
> >>>
> >>> Too real for you apparently...
> >>>
> >>> And there is nothing at all strange about treating a doctor as what
> >>> they are - a semi educated person trying to guess their way through
> >>> most diagnosis while trying to keep their ego inflated.
> >>>
> >>> Pete C.
> >>
> >> For your sake, I hope your doctors don't read RFC.
> >>
> >> Felice
> >
> > How would that be a problem? They know my ground rules when I first
> > interview them, nothing here would be any news to them.
> >
> > Pete C.
>
> I didn't realize when you were brought into the emergency room you got to
> "interview" your doctors. I figure bleeding is a rather serious thing and
> they send a doctor to see you, not a panel of doctors from whom you get to
> study their curriculum vitae.
>
> Jill

If they consult my medical directive, they won't be taking me to any
emergency room. If they don't consult my medical directive, they will
pay the price later. Treatment without consent (and my medical directive
explicitly denies consent) is assault, potentially assault with a deadly
weapon.

Pete C.