Omelet wrote:
> In article <5lxrmi3tn8yc$.dlg@sqwertz.com>,
> Steve Wertz <swertz@cluemail.compost> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:50:47 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>>
>>> In article <1awpmli1fi3b1$.dlg@sqwertz.com>,
>>> Steve Wertz <swertz@cluemail.compost> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:38:53 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Because gmail has REALLY good spam filters,
>>>>
>>>> Oh, the irony.
>>>
>>> Huh?
>>>
>>> I don't spam!
>>
>> Didn't say you did.
>>
>>
>> I was commenting on Google's ability to filter spam from Google
>> Mail so efficiently, but encourages spam in Google Groups.
>>
>> -sw
>
> Ah. Sorry.
>
> Gmail filters really are very good, and they appear to be "learning"
> filters (snippage)

the "learning" is in learning how to SPAM newsgroups. I can't begin to
count how many SPAM posts (and emails) I've deleted from gmail users in just
the past week. It's ridiculous.