JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>
> "Arri London" <biotech@ic.ac.uk> wrote in message
> news:46F68E30.AFC2B456@ic.ac.uk...
> >
> >
> > JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
> >>
> >> "Arri London" <biotech@ic.ac.uk> wrote in message
> >> news:46F5BF54.94F5521@ic.ac.uk...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Sqwertz wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 21:07:11 -0600, Arri London wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > LOL! Glad I don't eat steaks any more. A 30 percent char would have
> >> >> > been
> >> >> > repulsive to me even when I did eat beef. There is a huge difference
> >> >> > between good browning and charring. Charring is burning. Proper
> >> >> > browning
> >> >> > is *not* burning.
> >> >>
> >> >> Well, this is kinda what I'm referring to:
> >> >> http://www.zenreich.com/ZenWeb/images/steak4.jpg
> >> >>
> >> >> The one on the right is burnt, the one on the left is just about
> >> >> right. Browned and charred.
> >> >>
> >> >> -sw
> >> >
> >> > As with most things it's a matter of taste I suppose. Charred meat
> >> > tastes burnt to me. If you like then eat it in good health.
> >>
> >> "eat it in good health"
> >>
> >> What a pointless thing to say.
> >
> > ROTFL! Does the word 'sarcasm' mean anything to you?
>
> Sorry. The sarcasm indicator in Outlook Express doesn't always work right.
> :-)

LOL fair enough!