Peter A wrote:
>
> In article <47079D4D.21383F97@snet.net>, aux3.DOH.4@snet.net says...
> >
> > Dee Dee wrote:
> > >
> > > I briefly heard on the news (radio) this morning something about Sams'
> > > hamburger. For those who shop at Sams, give it a listen.
> > > Dee Dee
> >
> > More pre-formed frozen burger by-products. AFAIC anyone consuming those
> > things (can't even be called eating) deserves whatever ills may befall
> > them.
> >
>
> So, you think that if you're poor (and thus forced to shop at Sam's), or
> perhaps you just have bad taste, or you're trying a new product just to
> see how it is, then it's OK if you get potentially fatal food poisoning?
> Please explain your logic.
>
> Asshole.
>
> --
> Peter Aitken

Well there are some idiotic assumptions. Being poor doesn't mean you
have to buy frozen burger by-products, nor does it force you to shop at
Sam's. Indeed the poor probably can't afford to shop at Sam's because
the package sizes are so big and not cheap. As for the bad taste to
consume such junk, yes, they deserve it, just as the people who eat
nothing but fast food deserve to be obese as most of them are. Personal
responsibility.