In article <46C0C498.CA7B9F8F@sympatico.ca>, adavidsmith@sympatico.ca
says...
> Peter A wrote:
>
> > But it's not their own actions, it's someone else's actions. You are
> > asking an individual to be responsible for someone else's mistake. How
> > is that right?
>
> Christ man, it's not as if the cheese was cleverly disguised inside the
> burger. It was sitting right on top.
>

Why do you avoid responding to my points?

Do you peel apart all your food to see what's inside? Or, do feel that
you should be able to trust the restaurant to give you what you ordered?

Then you come up with these feeble-minded scenarios about the "remote
speaker" and so on. Give us a break.

None of us knows the real details about this situation. We are
discussing what has been reported, true or false, and speculating about
what might have really happened or not happened is just mental
masturbation. The report is that a person ordered a certain item, with
many repetitions of the order, and got something else that made him
sick. Yet you and many others think that it is his fault and not the
restaurant's.

I suspect all you treacle-brains listen to Rush. What an easy substitute
for thinking.

--
Peter Aitken