Ms P wrote:
>
>
> > Not true, Blake. Even cooler coffee would have burned this lady because
> > she had it between her legs, and she didn't remove her pants and the hot
> > liquid was held against her skin which helped extend the burn time on such
> > tender skin. She was an idiot for putting a hot cup of coffee in between
> > her legs while driving.
>
> Thus proving you don't know the facts. She wasn't driving. The car was
> stopped.

At least if she were driving she might an excuse for doing something as
stupid as putting a cup of coffee between her legs. the fast of the matter
is that she held her hot coffee between her thighs in a moving vehicle.
That is why she was scalded. It didn't really matter if the coffee was a
few degrees hotter that the average coffee, only that she thought she had
prehensile thighs.