Home

On Aug 16, 10:04?pm, "Pete C." <aux3.DO...@snet.net> wrote:
> Charlene Charette wrote:
>
> > I saw a magazine ad for a pot filler:
>
> > "Save the heavy lifting for the gym. with the <deleted> Pot Filler, you
> > can fil your pasta pot directly on the stove, eliminating the trip from
> > sink to stove."
>
> > These seem to be a current "in thing" with remodeling/design magazines.
> > Am I missing something? You fill the pot on the stove so that you
> > don't have to carry an heavy pot, but don't you still need to carry the
> > same heavy (and now hot) pot to the sink to drain it?
>
> > --Charlene
>
> > --
> > Law of the Theatre: At any event, the people whose seats are furthest
> > from the aisle arrive last.
>
> > email perronnellec at earthlink . net
>
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
>
> They make sense for commercial kitchen sized pots, but certainly aren't
> needed for residential kitchen sized pots.

Many commercial kitchens have a swing spigot over the cooking area,
Chinese kitchens typically have a spigot over the wok area because
thats where they wash woks. But totally unecessary for home
kitchens.... most folks don't cook with very large pots and even if
the pot is a bit on the large size it can be filled with a pitcher and
emptied with a ladle. I often add water with the pot lid, or an empty
tin from some ingredient

Sheldon

previous
next

Re: Meat is making me sick
Re: Jägermeister
Re: Please be careful renaming threads!
Re: Raclette maker? [Was: RFC: Proposal for new Usenet grooup - rec.food.cooking.chat ... ]
Re: Saving scraps for soup and stock
Oferty pracy Warszawa obsługa klienta
sÄ…d GrudziÄ…dz
konferencje
Fotele
Lampy wiszÄ…ce